Thoughts on Female Sexuality and Lesbianism


Lesbianism is an odd idea to me. Why would a woman desire to engage in sexual behavior with another woman? I would not know. I am a man.

Lesbianism is a mystery to me.

Female homosexuality – lesbianism – has always been far more acceptable than male homosexuality. Women are, perhaps, the ‘fairer sex,’ but likely not. Women may be more beautiful than males. But that is likely not the case either. Sure. They are smooth. Shapely. There is nothing more attractive, to a man at least, than an hourglass figure. My girlfriend has more of a pear shape, but she still has wide hips, and that is quite attractive. But the male form – the beauty of Michelangelo’s David, for instance – exceeds that of Botticelli’s Venus (for instance!).

I have noticed women are more open to lesbianism – or ‘experimenting.’ Which is, I think, an odd thing. There is a dynamic playing here, and that dynamic includes male sexual desire. Males lust after two women immersing themselves in one another – or engaging in two women simultaneously. Admittedly, I fantasize about a scenario in which another woman and I seduce my girlfriend into an overwhelming sexual frenzy. I must be honest, and I believe I am just beginning to be honest about this desire. I will never act on it or perhaps even openly reveal it.

But female sexuality is far more chaotic than male sexuality and demands order. It must be ordered. For without order, female sexuality will run amuck and harm not only individuals, but also society and civilization. The Greeks understood female sexuality, and expressed this understanding in stories like Pandora. And the Hebrews understood female sexuality, and expressed their understand in stories like Adam and Eve and Sampson and Delilah – both of which are focused on female chaos and disorder.

When I am out on a Saturday night, women – including my girlfriend – seem to become more ‘loose.’ What do I mean by that? They seem more relaxed about their sexuality – in a way far different from men. Men may care less about the way in which they engage with women. But females seem to care less not only about the way in which they engage with men, but ALSO women. They become far more touchy and giggly. They subtly express, in my opinion, submission – as female nature demands – except they also express it towards other women. This may not be full on lesbianism or even bi-sexualism. However, there is something sexual, and it is directed towards other women.

I have often thought my girlfriend wanted to get one of her friends to come home with us after a night of drinking. My girlfriend attracts other women all the time. And, interestingly enough, I attract other men all the time. It is not uncommon for two or three homosexuals to approach me in a single night. I am not interested in such arrangements in anyway, whatsoever, as male homosexuality is extremely dangerous, and, to me, is quite disgusting. It is, like female lesbianism, chaotic, though, I think, far more, because male homosexuality often accompanies disease, drug usage, and even suicide.

Biologically, homosexuality does not make sense, and I believe that women desire strong men to ultimately impregnate them. When you go into a club on a Saturday night, and see women scantly clad, cleavage and legs showing in excess, I believe they are expressing – consciously or unconsciously – the desire for sex and a strong male to impregnate them. That is the ultimate end of our biology. But lesbianism does not fit into this type of thinking. Lesbianism is purely emotional or hedonistic.

An old boss of mine once told me “All women are lesbians.” Perhaps that idea has stuck with me, because I see the way in which women behave toward one another, especially in a drunken, chaotic state, in which social rules and regulations are loosened or temporarily done away with. Most of the women I know – a vast majority, in fact – have not engaged in lesbian or bi-sexual behavior. But it seems that many have, and that makes me wonder about female sexuality.

Quick Thoughts: The End of the United States

1. Over the past week and a half, Wikileaks has released approximately 7,000 of 50,000 leaked John Podesta emails. John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager. Let me emphasize: These emails are devastating, and they are, I believe, de-legitimizing the American “system” – the government, the media, and business community. Here is just a taste of what is contained in the emails:

  • “Trump has seen a slight surge in Colorado and 2 out of 5 internals actually has him ahead by 2.” (Podesta writes on Trump doing far better than polls indicate.)
  • From ABC’s Donna Brazile: “As soon as the nomination is wrapped up, I will be your biggest surrogate…. Look forward to working with you…” (Media is intimately connected to Clinton campaign. John Harwood and Jack Tapper are also colluding with the Clinton campaign.)
  • “The governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL…” (Clinton Foundation receives funding from governments that support ISIS.)
  • “And as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.” (Podesta confirming that Clinton campaign wishes for a easily controlled, un-educated, ideologically subverted populace.)
  • “While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law….” (The FBI ought to reopen its investigation of Clinton.)
  • “[Catholics] can throw around “Thomistic” thought and “subsidiarity” and sound sophisticated because no one knows what they’re talking about…. It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith (referring to Catholicism). They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations…” (Emails between John Halpin and John Podesta, mocking the Catholic faith. There is another email in which Podesta contemplates a “Catholic Spring” within the Church to overthrow the “medieval dictatorship.”)
  • “[The Iranian Nuclear Agreement] condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf,” to which Podesta responds, “Yup.” (We are at risk of war with Russia. I will comment this shortly.)
  • “But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings to remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty).” (Podesta on Hillary Clinton.)
  • “So if we “give” Bernie this in the Convention’s rules committee, his people will think they’ve “won” something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn’t make any difference anyway.” (Clinton campaign colluding with the DNC to steal the Democratic nomination from Bernie Sanders.)
  • This is just the tip of the iceberg, folks. Not even a fourth of the Podesta emails have been released. Moreover, rumor has it that Clinton’s 33,000 deleted emails have been obtained, and that they will be released before Election Day.

I highly encourage each and every one of you to research this matter.

2. The hacking group Anonymous just released a video in which it claims that a video of Bill Clinton rapping a 13-year-old girl exists, and that it will be released before Election Day. Anonymous claims that the US Presidential Election is nearing an explosive crisis over this tape.

3. I am fearful that the United States may be plunged into civil war after the Presidential Election, regardless of whether Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton wins. Again, the Podesta email leaks are de-legitimizing the American “system.” Combined that with the fact that the United States is highly polarized at this moment in time – racially, ethnically, politically, economically – and you have a recipe for massive social strife

4. I am also fearful that we are in the midst of a Cold War with Russia, a precursor to World War III. Syria is the focal point of the conflict. But you need not listen to me on this matter. Jill Stein stated today the Donald Trump is a far better candidate than Hillary Clinton, because Clinton will lead us down the path of a nuclear holocaust.

Man Is Only Great When He is Passionate

I am the Platonic, and I am the Nietzschean;

I am the soul, and I am the body;

I am the Apollonian, and I am the Dionysian;

I am the ancient, and I am the modern;

I walk hand-in-hand with the weak and he who is unable to fend for himself,

But I revere and admire the conqueror of the weak: Alexander and Caesar – the Desert Fox and America’s Most Fighting General

I am Western man.

Why Christopher Columbus Is Hated

The once celebrated Christopher Columbus – in whom Americans, especially Italian-Americans, took great pride – has been rebranded as a genocidal, slave-owning tyrant. I think it is quite interesting how a figure like Columbus was once respected and celebrated and whose name is now kicked in the dirt, even by European and European-Americans.

Thank you, Howard Zinn – you dirty Communist. Liberal academics captured Western academia, and they tore down the foundations of the West.

I think it is interesting when the opponents of Columbus frame his doings in the following way: “Columbus stole Indian land!” Columbus did not steal Indian land – he conquered it fair and square. Conquest is a law of nature. It does not pay mind to liberal ideals and universalism. The Indians themselves understood conquest, as Indian tribes fought, killed, and enslaved other Indian tribes.

Had the Muslims sailed the Atlantic and discovered North America, they likely would have done the same – and perhaps worse. I mean, the Arabs did institute a slave trade that lasted 1400 years.

We live in a the age of slave morality – where the “virtues” of the weak are cherished and inculcated into the minds of the youth, while strength is viewed as oppressive and tyrannical. Christianity theology has been destroyed, but Christian morality remains. Masculinity is toxic. Western civilization is morally reprehensible. Columbus’ opponents hate Columbus because he demonstrated strength. He was a victor in history. Columbus’ opponents hate Columbus as a slave hates his master.

What is the main point of opposing Columbus? It is quite simple. Blacks riot when Black police officers shoot criminal Blacks. Blacks claim such acts are a result of White supremacy. That does not make sense, though, given that a Black officer killed a criminal Black. So, why do Blacks riot right over such events? They riot because the Black officer is symbolic of ‘White supremacy.’ Symbols are not emphasized enough in the modern world. Where am I going with this?…

Christopher Columbus is a symbol of the European dominance over the world. For that reason, non-Europeans, Communists and multiculturalists hate Columbus. Western civilization – whose root is the biology of European man – is (or perhaps was) full of strength and vigor. That is completely antithetical to minorities, feminists, multiculturalists and communists, all of whom are full of envy, weakness, and self-loathing.

Rousseau’s philosophy painted the European man as being far more violent than all other peoples, nations, tribes, and clans. That’s an anti-White lie. Europeans weren’t more violent – we just organized violence far better than most, if not all, others. Just like we organized civilization better than most, if not, all others.

And for that, Columbus is hated. It is no coincidence that Columbus’ destruction coincides with the de-Europeanization of America.

Tolerance is for Cowards

“Tolerance is for cowards.”

“Being tolerant requires nothing from you but to be quiet and to not make waves, holding tightly to your views and judgments without being challenged. Do not tolerate each other. Work hard, move into uncomfortable territory and understand each other.”

Two more quotes on tolerance:

“In the world it is called Tolerance, but in hell it is called Despair, the sin that believes in nothing, cares for nothing, seeks to know nothing, interferes with nothing, enjoys nothing, hates nothing, finds purpose in nothing, lives for nothing, and remains alive because there is nothing for which it will die.”

“Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.”

The Fate of America

The Fate of the United States of America – What is it?

I think this question can be answered in a few simple words: nationalism or internationalism.

The United States will remain a sovereign nation-state or it will transition and cede power to a centralized world authority. It is that simple. I imagine, if we are to move into an internationalist world order, that former nation-states will remain sovereign in certain respects, like the U.S. states, but will have ceded power to a centralized authority – which will be the ultimate arbiter of the world political system.

This is the primary issue of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The issues of abortion, healthcare, or even the 2nd Amendment are not what is on the ballot this election. What is on the ballot is whether the United States remains a sovereign nation-state, with borders, with national interests, with a unique cultural expression.

In Donald Trump, we find a candidate who wishes to preserve the nation-state. What does Clinton believe in? In Clinton’s own words, “a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.” Clinton’s vision is frightening. I am a red-blooded American – I do not trust government. The more power a government has, the more it is likely to turn tyrannical, for power tends to corrupt, absolutely power tends to corrupt absolutely. History is replete with examples of governments, especially democratic governments, turned usurpatious.

I am not necessarily a nationalist. I am quite sympathetic to the libertarian ideal of decentralization, even if it means decentralizing the national government. However, I find that nationalism is the only cure to creeping internationalism. Before we decentralize power to local government, we must decentralize power away from world political authorities – like the United Nations – to national governments. This also ensures the greatest amount of freedom for the people. The people may express themselves as they wish with more decentralized government. They may express their own ethnic and cultural interests without being impeded by some far-away centralized authority.

If Trump loses, and I think he will, those who favor decentralization must begin to take action in non-conventional ways. For if Hillary Clinton has her way with the United States, it will simply be homogenized into the “international community.” We will lose our country. We will lose our nation. We will lose are unique culture expression. We will lose our founding political document – the Constitution. The only thing we will have is shopping malls and other places at which we can mindlessly be consumers. No longer will be tied to the land and to a culture. Not even Nietzsche in his wildest dreams could imagine the nihilism that would be realized in Hillary Clinton’s America.

I don’t know what the future holds for the United States. But I am fearful of it. I truly am.

Western Man

I am in an odd mood tonight.

I am contemplating the future.

The United States of America, I think, is in rapid decline.

Western Civilization, I think, is in rapid decline.

Our earthly order, I think, is in rapid decline.

We have been homogenized into nothingness. We have become formless and indefinite. We lack identity. There is little in which we can find meaning and purpose. The family has been denigrated and deconstructed, along with nearly every facet of our once proud civilization. We no longer understand who we are. Western man views himself in the mirror and is befuddled and bewildered. Like the Jew, Western man is a wanderer. He no longer has a home. What was once his home now belongs to every being. Western man was once familiar with the world. He had clarity. He is now in a state of constant despair. He no longer recognizes his surroundings. He is pessimistic and defeated. His self-esteem is low and he is desperate for peace. Western man has begrudgingly accepted his fate. History will soon consume him, and he will be remembered only in name. Perhaps those who will replace Western man will write of him fondly. I doubt it. Western man is hated and despised. Western man was once strong and reigned over foreign men. Now foreign men reign over Western man. There is no way to resist and nowhere to which Western man can take refuge from the rising tide of color. This is what the Roman felt as the barbaric Germans advanced on Rome.

As I have been told, I must stand my ground, like that Roman soldier at Vesuvius whose commander failed to relive him of his duty and whose Fate was sealed as the current of ash and rock rushed towards him, consuming his body whole. That is greatness. That is honor. And that is what you cannot take away from a man.